Would you like some cookies – Why websites ask this?
This is the question that many computer users are receiving daily. What does it mean and why is it being […]
Meta rolled out its “pay or consent” model in October 2023, and is not the only offender; these models are widespread and almost standard practice for thousands of companies. Whilst the EU has started to address the issue, there remains no clear and comprehensive stance on the incompatibility of such models with human rights. The recent Meta announcement of a new version of “pay or consent” illustrates that by only addressing the symptoms of “pay or consent”, the core issues underpinning the model will never be rectified. As stated in the report, offering a reduced price and a third option with less personalised advertisement does not fix the problem.
Under these models, companies commoditise privacy, turning it from a universal right into a luxury product. Users unable to afford the cost are coerced into agreeing to invasive tracking practices, allowing companies to harvest vast amounts of personal data. While this may benefit businesses, it undermines individual autonomy, widens social inequality, and erodes public trust in digital services.
The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and other regulatory authorities have criticised these models, emphasising that genuine consent must be free of coercion or detriment. Yet inconsistent enforcement has enabled companies to exploit legal grey areas, bypassing GDPR’s requirements.
The commoditisation of privacy has significant consequences. It creates a two-tiered digital society where only the financially privileged can protect their data. This deepens the digital divide and perpetuates social inequality. Moreover, behavioural advertising which is central to these models, raises concerns about discrimination, manipulation, and heightened security risks.
The European Charter of Fundamental Rights affirms that privacy is inalienable and cannot be treated as a commodity. However, gaps in enforcement have allowed corporations to place profit over people’s rights, jeopardising both individuals and communities.
To address these challenges, regulators must prohibit “pay or consent” practices. Clearer guidelines are necessary to close existing loopholes and ensure consistent enforcement across EU member states. Additionally, fostering privacy-friendly business models, such as contextual advertising, can balance user rights with sustainable revenue streams.
As GDPR reaches a pivotal moment, the future of data protection depends on the EU’s resolve to uphold its principles. Will privacy remain a fundamental right, or will it become a privilege for the few? Ensuring a fair digital future means reaffirming privacy as a universal right, demanding transparency, and fostering innovations that respect individual freedoms.
Curious to learn more?
REQUEST A DEMO
Source:
This blog post is based on insights from “Six Years of the GDPR: Priced Out of Privacy?”, published by Access Now in November 2024.
Image by Megan Rexazin Cond